VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA
Shabina – Appellant
Versus
Shogun Gautam, S. P. Rampur – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri. P.K. Giri, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the opposite party.
2. The present contempt application has been filed for punishing the Opposite Party for willful disobedience of the judgment and order passed by Hon'ble Apex Court in Lalita Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P. (2014) 2 SCC 1 and by Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in Rina Kumari vs. State of U.P. (2015) 90 ACRC 583.
3. It is not in dispute that no specific order in respect of present applicant has been passed in the above noted judgments. However, general directions have been issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumar (supra) as well as by Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in Rina Kumari (supra), deliberate and willful violation whereof is being claimed by the applicant by submitting that a first information report in a rape case is not being lodged by the opposite parties.
4. On 21.10.2020 following order was passed:
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.