SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(All) 867

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, JJ.
Matsya Jivi Sahkari Samiti Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. And 6 Others – Respondents
Writ C No. 20203 of 2020
Decided on : 16-12-2020

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Vijay Kumar
For the Respondent: Sunil Kumar Singh

Point of Law: A conjoint reading of the provisions contained under Section 70 of the Act, 1965 and Rule 444C of the Rules, 1968 leave no manner of doubt that a complete procedure for settlement of disputes and the manner of reference of such disputes, including a dispute relating to an election under the provisions of the Act or the Rules made thereunder, is provided for. Any grievance, complaint or dispute relating to the election proceedings of a cooperative society can be called in question on the grounds specified under sub-rule (1) of Rule 444C by applying for a reference by making an appropriate application under Section 70 of the Act, 1965

Headnote:

Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Societies Rules, 1968 – Rule 444C – Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1965 – Section 70 – Election Proceedings – Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 226 – Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to decide the claim of the petitioner with regard to election proceedings of a cooperative society namely, Matsya Jivi Sahkari Samiti Ltd., Village Karauta, Block Brahampur, District Gorakhpur. – Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents has drawn attention of this Court to the provisions under Section 70 of the Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1965, and the proviso to subsection (1) thereof and also to Rule 444C (2) of the Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Societies Rules, 1968, to contend that once an election of a cooperative society has been held, the remedy available to the aggrieved party is by seeking a reference of the dispute to the Registrar. –

Finding of the Court:

Conjoint reading of the provisions contained under Section 70 of the Act, 1965 and Rule 444C of the Rules, 1968 leave no manner of doubt that a complete procedure for settlement of disputes and the manner of reference of such disputes, including a dispute relating to an election under the provisions of the Act or the Rules made thereunder, is provided for. – Any grievance, complaint or dispute relating to the election proceedings of a cooperative society can be called in question on the grounds specified under sub-rule (1) of Rule 444C by applying for a reference by making an appropriate application under Section 70 of the Act, 1965. – Complete mechanism with regard to settlement of disputes relating to election in a cooperative society having been provided for in the manner as aforestated, Court is not inclined to exercise our extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, in the facts of the present case. – It would be open to the petitioner to invoke the appropriate remedy, provided in terms of the statutory provisions under the Act, 1965 and the Rules made thereunder –

Result: Writ Petition Dismissed

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Vijay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.

2. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to decide the claim of the petitioner with regard to election proceedings of a cooperative society namely, Matsya Jivi Sahkari Samiti Ltd., Village Karauta, Block Brahampur, District Gorakhpur.

3. As per the averments made in the writ petition, in particular, in paragraphs 9 and 10, the elections have been held and declared on 22.11.2019 and the elected office bearers have also taken charge but the grievance of the petitioner with regard to the elections, raised in his complaints, has not been redressed.

4. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents has drawn attention of this Court to the provisions under Section 70 of the Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1965, and the proviso to subsection (1) thereof and also to Rule 444C (2) of the Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Societies Rules, 1968, to contend that once an election of a cooperative society has been held, the remedy available to the aggrieved party is by seeking a reference of the dispute to the Registrar.

5. To appreciate the aforesaid contentions, the relevant statutory provisions may be adverted to.

6. Section 70 under Chapter IX of The U.P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1965 reads as under :

    "70. Disputes which may be referred to arbitration. (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, if any dispute relating to the constitution, management of the business of a cooperative society other than a dispute regarding disciplinary action taken against a paid servant of a society arises

(a) among members, past members and persons claiming through members, past members and deceased members; or

(b) between a member, past member or any person claiming through, a member, past member or deceased member, and the society, its Committee of Management or any officer, agent or employee of the society, including any past officer, agent or employee; or

(c) between the society or its committee and any past committee, any officer, agent or employee or any past officer, past agent or past employee or the nominee, heir or legal representative of any deceased officer, deceased agent, or deceased employee of the society; or

(d) between a cooperative society and any other cooperative society or societies:

such dispute shall be referred to the Registrar for action in accordance with the provisions of this Act and the rules and no court shall have jurisdiction to entertain any suit or other proceeding in respect of any such dispute:

Provided that a dispute relating to an election under the provisions of this Act or rules made thereunder shall not be referred to the Registrar until after the declaration of the result of such election.

(2) For the purpose of subsection (1), the following shall be deemed to be included in dispute relating to the constitution, management or the business of a cooperative society, namely

(a) claims for amounts due when a demand for payment is made and is either refused or not complied with whether such claims are admitted or not by the opposite party;

(b) a claim by a surety against the principal debtor where the society has recovered from the surety any amount in respect of any debt or demand due to it from the principal debtor as a result of the default of the principal debtor or whether such debt or demand is admitted or not;

(c) a claim by a society for any loss caused to it by a member, officer, agent, or employee including past or deceased member, officer, agent, or employee, whether individually or collectively and whether such loss be admitted or not; and

(d) all matters relating to the objects of the society mentioned in the byelaws as also those relating to the election of office-bearers.

(3) If any question arises whether a dispute referred to the Registrar under this section is a dispute relating to the constitution, management or the

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    Judicial Analysis

    SupremeToday

    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top