NAHEED ARA MOONIS, DEEPAK VERMA
Mata Kaila Devi Gangsar Stone Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner Sri Birendra Singh, Sri S. Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 3 and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 1 and 2.
2. The instant petition has been filed invoking extraordinary jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the following prayer;
2. Issue any other suitable writ, order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
3. Award cost of the petition to the petitioner."
3. The proceedings initiated against the petitioner by issuing Demand Notice under Section 13 (2) dated 4.2.2019 and Possession Notice dated 13.3.2020 under Section 13 (4) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for the sake of brevity hereinafter referred to as 'SARFAESI Act” read with Rule 8 of Security Interest (Enfor
Baburam Prakash Chandra Maheshwari v. Antarim Zila Parishad
Harbanslal Sahnia and another v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and others
Kanaiyalal Lalchand Sachdev and others vs. State of Maharashtra and others
Punjab National Bank vs. O.C. Krishnan and others
State of Maharashtra Vs. Digambar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.