SIDDHARTH
Sachin Saini – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SIDDHARTH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.
2. The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Sachin Saini, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 889 of 2020, under Section 452, 323, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station-Khurja Nagar, District-Bulandshahar, during pendency of trial.
3. Prior notice of this bail application was served in the office of Government Advocate and as per Chapter XVIII, Rule 18 of the Allahabad High Court Rules and as per direction dated 20.11.2020 of this Court in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/s 438 Cr.P.C. No. 8072 of 2020, Govind Mishra @ Chhotu vs. State of U.P. hence, this anticipatory bail application is being heard. Grant of further time to the learned A.G.A as per Section 438 (3) Cr.P.C. (U.P. Amendment) is not required.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that earlier father of the applicant has lodged an first information report against son of the informant on 24.08.2020 under Sections 147, 148, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. By way of counter blast present first information report has been lodged on 20.09.2020 implicating the applicant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.