ALI ZAMIN
Parveen Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
ORDER :
Ali Zamin, J.
1. Short counter affidavit filed by Sri Dinesh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and perused the record.
3. On the basis of compromise entered into between the parties, the present application under section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the entire proceeding of Complaint Case No. 205/9 of 2015 (Aruna Rani Vs. Parveen Kumar & others), under section 498A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. & 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Adarsh Mandi, District Shamli, pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shamli.
4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that on account of some disputes, opposite party no. 2 had filed the Complaint Case in which applicants were summoned by the trial court vide order dated 25.06.2015. Thereafter, applicants moved an Application No. 25403 of 2017 under section 482 Cr.P.C. before this Court and obtained bail from the trial court on the basis of order dated 16.08.2017 passed on the application by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Now the parties have settled their disputes amicably. Op
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.