JUDGMENT :

Prakash Padia, J.

1. Heard Sri Shyam Lal Yadav, learned Counsel for the petitioners. Smt. Praveen Shukla, learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 3, Sri Azad Rai, learned Counsel for respondent No. 2, and Sri Dharam Pal Singh, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Harish Chandra Singh, learned Counsel for the respondent Nos. 4 and 9.

2. The petitioners have preferred the present writ petition with the prayer to quash the order dated 9.1.2020 passed by the member of Board of Revenue U.P. at Prayagraj in Case No. RES/1272/2018/Kaushambi (Harish Chand and others v. Shiv Singh and others).

3. Facts in brief as contained in the writ petition are that a suit being Case No. 374/86/197 of 1997 was filed. The said suit was finally allowed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate vide its judgment and order 6.9.2001. Against the aforesaid order, a revision was preferred by the Dharamraj and Ram Krapal being Revision No. 5 of 2001-02 as provided under section 333 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 before the Board of Revenue. The said revision was dismissed in default on 19.1.2006. Against aforesaid order, a restoration application was filed by Harish Chandr