B.K.NARAYANA, RAVI NATH TILHARI
Kaushalya Chaubey – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ravi Nath Tilhari, J.
1. We have heard Sri Nand Kishor Mishra learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 and have perused the material on record. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition for the following reliefs:
(b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents not to realize/recover the amount Rs. 57,36,750/- mineral cost (Khaniz Mutya) as well as penalty sum of Rs. 50,000/- from the petitioner on the basis of the notice dated 27.10.2018.
(c) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to restore the mining permit of the petitioner and issue Form MM-11 for the remaining quantity by extending the time period which has been lapsed due to passing of the impugned order dated 13.7.2018, cancelling the mining permit.
(d) Issue any other suitable writ, order or
A.K, Kraipak v. Union of India
Dharampal Satyapal v. Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise and others
East India Commercial Co. Ltd., Calcutta and another v. The Collector of Customs, Calcutta
Maharashtra State Financial Corporation v. Suvarna Board Mills and another
Managing Director, ECIL, Hyderabad and others v. B. Karunakar and others
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India and another
Metal Forgings and another v. U. O.I. and others
Mohinder Singh Gill and another v. The Chief Election Commissioner, New Delhi and others
U.O.I, and others v. Madhumilan Syntex Pvt. Ltd. and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.