VIRENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Vimlesh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This Criminal Appeal, under Section 374 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'Code'), has been preferred by the appellant-Vimlesh (hereinafter referred to as 'appellant') against the judgment and order dated 28.1.2016, passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 10/Special judge Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as 'POCSO Act'), Unnao, in Special Sessions Trial No. 15/2015 (State vs. Vimlesh), arising out of Case Crime No. 1043/2014, P.S. Makhi, District Unnao, whereby the appellant has been convicted and sentenced for offence under Section 376 (2) I.P.C., for 10 years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 10,000/- and for offence U/s 366 I.P.C., for 5 years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 5,000/- with further direction that all the sentences shall run concurrently.
2. The prosecution case, in brief, is that Dharam Pal (P.W.-2), father of victim (P.W.-3), lodged the first information report (Ext.-Ka-2) (in short F.I.R.) on 15.12.2014, at about 15:30 p.m. at P.S. Makhi, District Unnao, alleging that P.W.-3 aged about 14 years, had left her house on 07.12.2014 to go to her maternal uncle (
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.