SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(All) 137

AJIT SINGH
Mukesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Munesh Kumar Upadhyay.
For the Respondent: G.A.

JUDGMENT :

1. Counter affidavit filed on behalf of State in the Court today is taken on record.

2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

3. This criminal appeal u/s 374(2) Cr.P.C. has been filed against the judgement and order dated 8.9.2020 passed by learned Additional District and Session Judge, Court No. 5, Hathras in Session Trial No. 351 of 2009 (State vs. Mukesh Kumar) arising out of Case Crime no.104 of 1998, u/s 308 I.P.C., P.S.-Sasani, District-Hathras, whereby the appellant has been convicted and sentenced for the offence u/s 308 I.P.C. for five years imprisonment and a fine of Rs.5000/- and in default of payment for five months additional imprisonment.

4. The prosecution story in brief is that on 4.5.1998 at about 6:00 O'clock in the evening the son of the complainant Ravendra Kumar was going towards the canal, then the accused who used to live in his brother-in-law's house, was coming from the opposite side and having seen the complainant's son alone, went back to his house and returned on bicycle with a knife and started assaulting his son with the knife, as a result of which he became unconscious and fell down on the ground. After

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top