K.J.THAKER, GAUTAM CHOWDHARY
Sheoraj Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Sri Ishir Sripat, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State.
Petitioners have made the following prayers:
(ii) issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 not to arrest the petitioners in Case Crime no. 0626 of 2020, under Sections 304B, 498A IPC and ¾ Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Ghandhi Park, District Aligarh.
(iii) Any other or further writ, order or direction as is deemed fit and proper by this Hon'ble Court.
Facts in nutshell for our puposes are that daughter of the first informnat had married Pushpendra Singh. The daughter of the first informant on 2.8.2020 gave birth a girl child at Jaideep Nursing Home, which was now creator of the problem between the parties. It is a matter of fact that after delivery when the deceased was shifted to Varun Hospital, she died. The respondent no. 3 preferred a complaint under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., which was registered as Application No. 256/11/20 before the Chief Jud
Union of India vs. Prakash P. Hinduja and Another
Rupan Deol Bajaj v. K.P.S. Gill; reported in (1995) SCC (Cri) 1059
Rajesh Bajaj v. State of NCT of Delhi; reported in (1999) 3 SCC 259
Medchl Chemicals & Pharma (P) Ltd. v. Biological E Ltd. & Ors; reported in 2000 SCC (Cri) 615
Satya Pal v. State of U.P. (2000 Cr.L.J. 569)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.