PANKAJ NAQVI, VIVEK AGARWAL
Namdev Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Sri Manish Tiwari, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Kartikeya Saran for the petitioner, Ms. Katyayini, learned counsel for the informant and Ms. Manju Thakur, the learned AGA.
1. The dispute between the parties is essentially relating to maladministration and misfeasance of the trust properties situate at Mathura in which both sides are trading allegations against each other.
2. Sri Swami Gopanand Ban Maharaj / respondent no. 4 lodged an FIR against the petitioner on 9.12.2018 as Case Crime No.1783/2018, under Sections 420/467/468/471/506 IPC in which after investigation, a final report came to be submitted on 7.1.2019. Respondent no. 4 filed a protest on 24.4.2019 before the learned CJM, Mathura who on 23.12.2019 rejected the final report and directed the matter to be treated as a complaint fixing dates for statements under Section 200 Cr.P.C. Meanwhile, the petitioner (Namdev Sharma) lodged two FIR's relating to forgeries and illegalities committed against respondent no.4 on 11.10.2019 and 25.10.2019 as Case Crime Nos.930/2019, under Sections 420/467/468/471/504/506/120-B IPC & 964/2019, under Sections 420/406/506 IPC, wherein after investigation, a charge
Abhinandan Jha vs. Dinesh Mishra, AIR 1968 SC 117
H.S. Bains vs. State of U.P., AIR 1980 SC 1883
India Carat Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Karnataka, AIR 1989 SC 885
Bhagwant Singh vs. Commissioner of Police
Vishnu Kumar Tiwari vs. State of U.P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.