SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(All) 323

SHAMIM AHMED
Rinkaj Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For The Appellant : Ramesh Kumar Shukla, Rohit Nandan Shukla
For The Respondent: G.A.

JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned

A.G.A. appearing for the State and perused the record.

This application has been filed seeking the release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 19 of 2021, under Section 3(1) of U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Ahraula, District Azamgarh.

The chief plank of the submissions made on behalf of accused is that in all cases which have been made the basis to impose the provisions of Gangster Act against the accused, he has already been granted bail by the Court. Contention is that the provisions of the Act have been ill-used by the Police in order to perpetuate the detention of the applicant in jail anyhow even though the offence under the aforesaid Act is not made out. Submission is that the applicant is not a gangster and has never acted or conducted himself as such. Counsel for the applicant has also tried to demonstrate that the alleged previous offences which are said to have been committed by the applicant can at the most be said to be stray incident of breach of law having no nexus with the definition of a gangster as has been provided in t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top