VIVEK KUMAR SINGH
Gaurav Khanna – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Vivek Kumar Singh, J.
1. Counter affidavit filed on behalf of opposite party no. 2, is taken on record.
2. Heard Sri Mithilesh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel on behalf of applicants, Sri Sharad Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel on behalf of opposite party and Sri Sanjay Singh, learned AGA-I for the State.
3. The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants, Gaurav Khanna and Saurabh Khanna, with a prayer to grant them anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 0038 of 2019, under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C., Police Station-Kotwali ,District-Kanpur Nagar, during pendency of trial.
4. It has been contended by learned counsel on behalf of applicants that applicants have not committed any offence as mentioned in the firstinformation report lodged by the opposite party no. 2. The applicants and opposite no. 2 both are the partners of the firm in the name and style of M/s Khas Polymer. The applicants tried to get loan from the concern bank namely Punjab National Bank, the concern bank after verification of the documents and consent with the partners of the firms granted the loan of Rs. 16,85,840/-in favour of the firm on 20.11.2017.
5.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.