VIKAS KUNVAR SRIVASTAV
Ali Mohammad – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Vikas Kunvar Srivastav, J.
1. The case is called out.
2. Learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Devendra Pratap, Advocate and learned A.G.A. for the State, Sri S.P. Tiwari, Advocate are present in the Court.
3. The present application is moved on behalf of the applicants to quash the criminal proceeding in Session Trial No.26/2018, arising out of Case Crime No.858/2015, under Sections 323, 504, 308, 325 I.P.C., Police Station-Kotwali City, District-Hardoi pending before Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.11, Hardoi on the basis of compromise.
4. Sri Shashank Singh, Advocate holding brief of Ms. Anita Singh Nagore, Advocate, put his appearance on behalf of the opposite parties no.2 to 4 through their Vakalatnama, the same is taken on record. Office is directed to get registered the same and duly place on record.
5. Learned counsels for the accused-applicants drew the attention of the court towards their earlier application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. in Crl. Misc. Case No.666/2021, wherein they expressed their willingness to amicably settle their family dispute, by reason of which criminal proceedings in Session Trial No.26/2018 (State Vs. Rahman and Ors.), Case Crime No.858/20
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.