PRAKASH PADIA
Madhuri Shrivastav – Appellant
Versus
Praveen Kumar Shrivastav – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Prakash Padia, J.
1. Pursuant to the order passed by this Court on 2.3.2021 both the petitioners namely Smt. Madhuri Shrivastav and Ms. Vaishnavi appeared in person before this Court. The respondent no.1/Praveen Kumar Shrivastav also appeared in person.
2. Mr. Dhruv Narayan Mishra, who was appointed Amicus Curiae by order of this Court dated 26.2.2020, is also present to assist the Court.
3. The petitioners have preferred present petition with the following prayers :-
2. Issue another order or direction commanding the respondent No.1 to pay sum of Rs.2,83,600/-to petitioners with simple interest since January, 2015, within a stipulated period of time, in compliance of the judgment/decree dated 17.01.2015, passed by the Court below in Marriage Case No.291/2003.
3. Issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may found deem fit and proper with the facts and
Gian Devi v. The Superintendent, Nari Niketan, Delhi and others
Lata Singh v. State of U.P. and another
Bhagwan Dass v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Deepika and another v. State of U.P. and others
National Bal Bhawan and another Vs. Union of India and others reported in (2003) 9 SCC 671
State of West Bengal and others Vs. Banibrata Ghosh and others reported in (2009) 3 SCC 250
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.