SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(All) 340

DINESH KUMAR SINGH
Satypal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Kamlesh Singh
For the Respondent: G.A.,Manoj Kumar Misra

JUDGMENT :

1. Present criminal revision under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C. has been filed impugning the order dated 03.03.2020 passed by the Addl Sessions Judge, Court No.11, Hardoi in S.T. No.111 of 2018: State vs Pawan Singh and Ors. arising out of Crime No.267 of 2017 registered under Sections 452, 302, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Kachauna, District Hardoi.

2. Learned Trial Court vide impugned order has summoned the revisionist under Section 319 Cr.P.C. on an application filed by the complainant, respondent No.2 to face trial as an additional accused.

3. An FIR was registered at Case Crime No.0267 of 2017 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 302, 504, 506 IPC P.S. Kachauna, Hardoi on a written complaint of respondent No.2 having allegations that on 02.11.2017 at around 9:00 PM. accused Pawan Singh, Satyapal Singh (revisionist), Sonu Singh all sons of Barrister Singh, Harshit @ Jeepu s/o Satyapal Singh, Munna s/o Rajaram came to the house of the complainant and told the uncle of the complainant that he had to leave the land. When uncle of the complainant objected, all these accused entered the house of the complainant. Accused-Pawan, Sonu, Harshit and Munna caught hold of the uncle and pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top