SHAMIM AHMED
Pramod Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SHAMIM AHMED, J.
1. Heard Sri. Onkar Singh, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri. Dheeraj Singh (Bohra), learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
2. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the entire proceedings in Case No. 14943 of 2020 (Pramod Kumar and Others vs. State) in view of the charge sheet dated 9.9.2020 arising out of case crime no. 29 of 2020, under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 354, 354B, 376, 511 IPC and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Mahila Thana District Meerut.
3. In compliance of the order dated 22.7.2021 passed by this Court, applicant no. 1-Pramod Kumar and his son Vipin Kumar has brought two drafts before this Court. The first draft is of Rs. 9,00,000/- dated 24.8.2021 bearing Draft No. 911254 in the name of Tanu Sharma (opposite party no. 2) and the second draft is of Rs. 6,00,000/- dated 24.8.2021 bearing Draft No. 911253 in the name of Tanu Sharma (opposite party no. 2). The total sum of two drafts is Rs. 15,00,000/-. The same has been handed over to opposite party no. 2 Tanu Sharma by the applicants before this Court which was acknowledged by Sri. Dhe
Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab
Narendra Singh and Others vs. State of Punjab and Others
Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Others vs. State of Gujarat and Another
R.P. Kapoor vs. State of Punjab
State of Bihar vs. P.P. Sharma
State of Haryana vs. Bhajanlal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.