SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(All) 547

Y.K.SRIVASTAVA
Pinkal Singh @ Raghvendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Lal Chandra Mishra
For the Opposite Party : G.A

JUDGMENT :

Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, J.

1. Heard Sri Lal Chandra Mishra, learned counsel for the applicants and Ms. Sushma Soni, learned Additional Government Advocate for the Stateopposite party no.1.

2. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 13 of 2019, Ramnaresh @ Naresh vs. Pinkal Singh @ Raghvendra Singh and others, under Sections 504, 506 IPC and 3(1)(Gha) SC/ST Act, P.S. Kotwali Dehat, District Mirzapur and also to quash the summoning order dated 15.02.2021 passed by the Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Mirzapur.

3. Learned counsel for the applicants has drawn attention to the complaint dated 04.07.2018 and the statements recorded under Sections 200 and 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973[the Code] and has sought quashing of the summoning order and the entire proceedings by referring to the factual aspects of the case and the defence which is sought to be set up on behalf of the applicants.

4. Learned Additional Government Advocate submits that the contention which is sought to be raised, would require appreciation of evidence and entering into the disputed questions of fact, which would be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top