Y.K.SRIVASTAVA
Rohit Bhati @ Rohit Pratap Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Abhishek Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Bhuvnesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and Ms. Sushma Soni, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State-opposite party.
2. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings related to Case Crime No. 0721 of 2020 (State Vs. Rohit Bhati and others) under Section 498A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Kavinagar, District Ghaziabad pending before Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad.
3. On the previous occasion upon submissions of learned counsel for the parties that the matter relates to a matrimonial dispute and that the parties have amicably settled the dispute and have filed a compromise before the court below, the following order was passed.
It is contended that both the parties have entered into compromise in the court below. A short counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of opposite party no. 2 stating that she does not want to contest the case against the appl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.