IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.
Dinesh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 17956 of 2021
Decided On : 18-06-2021
Indian Penal Code,1860 - Section 229-A- 174-A – Criminal Procedure Code,1973 - Section 82 , 313 - U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 - Section 193 (1) – Shall Intentionally Cause - Proclamation For Person Absconding- Applicant is neither gang leader nor member of any Gang. It is next contended that four cases have been shown against applicant in FIR/Gang Chart and in said case/cases, applicant has been granted bail which has been properly explained in Supplementary Affidavit filed in case.- It is next contended that without any consideration of evidence by police about evidence that may show that applicant is a member of a criminal gang or its leader, he has been implicated in present crime.- There is no evidence on record to show that applicant is a member of a criminal gang or its leader - It is further contended that there is no possibility of applicant either fleeing away from judicial process or tampering with witnesses - Applicant who is in jail since, undertakes that he will not misuse liberty, if granted
Finding Of The Court : Applicant misuses liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and applicant fails to appear before court on date fixed in such proclamation, then, trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of Indian Penal Code - Applicant shall remain present, in person, before trial court on dates fixed for (i) opening of case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. - Court in opinion of trial court absence of applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
Result: Application disposed of.
ORDER :
1. Heard Sri. Mohd. Shoeb Khan, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri. Sanjay Singh, learned AGA-I, for the State.
2. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive of the police concerned, the applicant is neither gang leader nor member of any Gang. It is next contended that four cases have been shown against the applicant in the FIR/Gang Chart and in the said case/cases, the applicant has been granted bail which has been properly explained in the Supplementary Affidavit filed in this case. It is next contended that without any consideration of evidence by the police about the evidence that may show that the applicant is a member of a criminal gang or its leader, he has been implicated in the present crime. There is no evidence on record to show that the applicant is a member of a criminal gang or its leader. It is further contended that there is no possibility of applicant either fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses. Applicant who is in jail since 25.08.2020, undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty, if granted.
3. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer but has not disputed the aforesaid fact.
4. Keeping in view the submissions advanced and the provisions for Section 19 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, evidence, complicity of the accused, reformative theory of punishment and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.
5. Let the applicant-Dinesh Yadav, involved in Case Crime No. 870 of 2020, under Section 3 (1) of U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Gulariha, District-Gorakhpur, be enlarged on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:-
(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C.
6. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.
8. The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
9. The computer generated copy of such order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned.
10. The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.