SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(All) 592

SANJAY KUMAR SINGH
Bhootnath – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Applicant : Amit Kumar Srivastava

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. Amit Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Rabindra Kumar Singh, learned Additional Government Advocate assisted by Mr. Rajmani Yadav, brief holder representing the State and perused the record of the case.

2. By means of this application, applicant-Bhootnath, who is involved in Case Crime No. 84 of 2019, under sections 376, 323, 363 IPC and section 3/4 of The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, police station Jafarganj, district Fatehpur, seeks enlargement on bail during the pendency of trial.

3. As per prosecution case, in brief, the first information report dated 01.06.2019 has been lodged by informant-Keshanlal Sonkar under section 363 IPC against unknown person alleging inter-alia that on 01.06.2019 at about 4.00 a.m. her daughter, whose date of birth is 12.10.2002 had gone to attend the call of nature, but did not return home.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case with some ulterior motive. The FIR has been lodged against unknown person. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that as per medic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top