SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(All) 593

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SALIL KUMAR RAI, J.
Ajay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 21600 of 2021
Decided on : 02-07-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Shyam Kishore Yadav, Satya Narayan Yadav

Point of Law: Criminal Conspiracy and Cheating - Bail granted - Nature of evidence, prima facie satisfaction of Court in support of charge and without expressing any opinion on merits of case, court find it to be a case of bail.

Headnote:

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 439 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B - Seeking bail - Forgery of valuable security, will - Applicant that no recovery was made from applicant and a false recovery memo was prepared - There is no independent witness to recovery referred in First Information Report. It was further brought to notice of Court by counsel for applicant that who has been assigned similar role as that of applicant has already been granted bail vide order passed by this Court in Criminal Misc.Bail Application - Applicant is in jail since 2.2.2021.

Finding of the court: It is also clarified that in case of breach of any condition by the applicant as specified above, same shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. It is further clarified that if any fact mentioned by counsel for the applicant in affidavit/bail application or stated orally is found to be false, learned AGA or the complainant would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of bail - Direction issued.

Result: Bail application disposal of

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard the counsel for the applicant and the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of Uttar Pradesh.

2. This bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking bail in Case Crime No. 64 of 2021 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B I.P.C at Police Station Kaushambi District Ghaziabad during the pendency of trial.

3. It has been submitted by the counsel for the applicant that no recovery was made from the applicant and a false recovery memo was prepared. There is no independent witness to the recovery referred in the First Information Report. It was further brought to the notice of the Court by the counsel for the applicant that Pawan Kumar who has been assigned similar role as that of the applicant has already been granted bail vide order dated 19.5.2021 passed by this Court in Criminal Misc.Bail Application No.19707 of 2021. The applicant is in jail since 2.2.2021.

4. The Additional Government Advocate has opposed the bail application of the applicant.

5. Having heard the submission of the counsel and after perusing the records and also after considering the nature of evidence, prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.

6. Let the applicant -Ajay Kumar S/o Kailash Chandra be released on bail in Case Crime No. 64 of 2021 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B I.P.C at Police Station Kaushambi District Ghaziabad on furnishing of personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate/Court concerned subject to the condition that the applicant will attend and cooperate in trial proceedings on the date fixed after release and will not tamper with the witnesses and shall not indulge in any illegal activity during the bail period.

7. It is further clarified that the observations made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of the present bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.

8. It is also clarified that in case of breach of any condition by the applicant as specified above, the same shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. It is further clarified that if any fact mentioned by the counsel for the applicant in the affidavit/bail application or stated orally is found to be false, the learned AGA or the complainant would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of bail.

9. The party shall file a computer generated copy of this order downloaded from the official website of High Court, Allahabad. The concerned court shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of the High Court, Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top