SUNEET KUMAR
Prabhunath Shukla – Appellant
Versus
Gaurav Srivastava, Upziladhikari Sadar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned standing counsel.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that a general direction was issued in Chandra Bali vs. Addl. Commissioner and others, Writ-C No. 6635 of 2012. Despite direction, the pending restoration has not been decided within stipulated time. Learned counsel for the applicant has not placed on record the order sheet of the proceedings.
3. In view thereof, the contempt application is disposed of.
4. However, it is provided that in the event of the applicant making an application to expedite the proceedings pending before the competent court, it is expected that the court shall consider and decide the applicant's' application, in accordance with law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.