Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SUNEET KUMAR, J.
Prabhunath Shukla - Appellant
Versus
Gaurav Srivastava, Upziladhikari Sadar – Respondent
Contempt Application (Civil) No.1757 of 2020
Decided on : 09-07-2021
Direction issued by court - Order sheet of proceedings - Applicant submits that a general direction was issued in Chandra Bali vs. Addl. Commissioner and others, Writ-C - Despite direction, pending restoration has not been decided within stipulated time - Learned counsel for applicant has not placed on record order sheet of the proceedings.
Finding of the court: It is provided that in the event of the applicant making an application to expedite the proceedings pending before the competent court, it is expected that the court shall consider and decide the applicant's' application, in accordance with law.
Result: Contempt application is disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned standing counsel.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that a general direction was issued in Chandra Bali vs. Addl. Commissioner and others, Writ-C No. 6635 of 2012. Despite direction, the pending restoration has not been decided within stipulated time. Learned counsel for the applicant has not placed on record the order sheet of the proceedings.
3. In view thereof, the contempt application is disposed of.
4. However, it is provided that in the event of the applicant making an application to expedite the proceedings pending before the competent court, it is expected that the court shall consider and decide the applicant's' application, in accordance with law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
