REKHA DIKSHIT
Sahil Beg – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. This bail application has been filed by the accused-applicant, who is involved in Case Crime No.256 of 2020, under section 3(1) of Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Itiyathok, District Gonda.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in the gang chart two cases are shown against the accused applicant. In all the two cases he has been released on bail. It is further submitted that no other case is pending against him. It is further submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from judicial custody or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail.
4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but did not dispute the factual submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and rival contention of learned counsel, without commenting upon the merit of the case, I am of the opinion that the accused applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
6. Let the applicant-Sahil Beg, i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.