SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(All) 612

VIKAS KUNVAR SRIVASTAV
Shabbir – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Anil Kumar Srivastava, Ravindra Kumar Dwivedi.

ORDER :

1. The case is called out through video conferencing.

2. Learned counsel for the bail-applicant Sri. Anil Kumar Srivastava, Advocate and learned A.G.A. for the State Sri. Prem Prakash, Advocate are connected through video conferencing in virtual hearing of the case.

3. The present bail-application is moved on behalf of accused-applicant/Shabbir, who is involved in Case Crime No. 209 of 2020, under Sections 363, 366, 376, 506 of I.P.C. Section 3/4 of POCSO Act and Section 3(2)(5) of SC/ST Act, registered at Police Station Motigarpur, District Sultanpur.

4. Reading over the first information report lodged on 13.07.2020, learned counsel for the bail applicant submits the prosecution case, as emerging from the first information report and the statements of the witnesses is that, according to the complaint by the informant mother of the minor victim, one Udairaj, a neighbour boy who was on talking terms with her minor daughter, aged about 16 years, on 03.07.2020 enticed her to come near a tube-well of one Ashok Singh alongwith her Adhaar Card, Bank Passbook and some cash. The victim met with Udairaj as suggested by him alongwith her Adhaar Card, Bank Passbook and cash of Rs. 19,000/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top