SANJAY KUMAR SINGH
Dheeraj Kumar Shukla – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Keeping in view the Pandemic (COVID-19), the case is taken up through video conferencing.
2. Heard Mr. Rajiv Lochan Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Virendra Kumar Maurya, learned Additional Government Advocate assisted by Mr. Prashant Kumar Singh, learned Brief holder appearing on behalf of State of U.P. through video conferencing and perused the material placed on record.
3. By means of this application, the applicant, who is involved in Case Crime No. 0532 of 2020, under sections 8/20 of Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, police station Jhunsi, district Prayagraj, is seeking enlargement on bail during the pendency of trial.
Facts
4. In nutshell, the facts which led to the prosecution of accused are that on 23.6.2020 informant (Sub Inspector Ranendra Kumar Singh, UP S.T.F. field Unit Prayagraj) lodged First Information Report at police station Jhusi, District Prayagraj against four accused persons, namely, Dhiraj Kumar Shukla (applicant), Praveen Maurya alias Punit Maurya, Dhiraj Maurya and Rishabh Kumar alleging inter alia that on 23.6.2020, he along with other police personnel were busy in the city area for collecting information regarding i
Gunwantlal v. The State of M.P.
Gurbax Singh v. State of Haryana(2001(3) SCC 28)
Madan Lal and Anr. v. State of Himachal Pradesh
Megh Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Superintendent & Remembrancer of Legal Affairs
Union of India Vs. Rattan Mallik @ Habul
Union of India Vs. Shiv Shanker Kesari
Union of India Vs. Ram Samujh 1999 (9) SCC 429
Durand Didien v. Chief Secretary. Union Territory of Goa. 1990 1 SCC 95
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.