SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(All) 669

KAUSHAL JAYENDRA THAKER, SUBHASH CHAND
Satayawati – Appellant
Versus
Vidya Prakash – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sushil Kumar Pandey.
For the Respondent: Pankaj Rai.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Sushil Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the appellant, Sri Pankaj Rai, learned counsel for the respondent-insurance company and perused the judgment and order impugned.

2. This appeal, at the behest of the claimants, challenges the judgment and award dated 13.7.2017 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge, Court No.1, Muzaffar Nagar (hereinafter referred to as 'Tribunal') in M.A.C.No.370 of 2014 awarding a sum of Rs.31,99,757/- with interest at the rate of 7% as compensation.

3. The accident is not in dispute. As per the judgment of Apex Court in U.P.S.R.T.C. Vs. Km Mamta and Others, AIR 2016 SCC 948, all the grounds raised in the appeal are required to be adjudicated and that is how, we would decide issue of negligence of driver and quantum and would go ahead with the discussion. The issue of negligence decided by the Tribunal has been partly decided in favour of appellants and none of the drivers or insurance companies have challenged the award. The respondents have not challenged the liability imposed on them jointly and sev

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top