KAUSHAL JAYENDRA THAKER, SUBHASH CHAND
Ramesh Chandra Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Jagdish Chandra Samdani – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Shri Udit Chandra, learned counsel for the appellants and Sri Sudhanshu Behari Lal Gour, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The written submission of learned counsel for appellants is also taken on record.
3. This appeal, at the behest of the claimants, challenges the judgment dated 5.8.2008 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge, Pilibhit (hereinafter referred to as 'Tribunal') in Claim Petition No.63 of 2006 awarding a sum of Rs.6,50,000/-with interest at the rate of 6% as compensation.
4. The accident is not in dispute. The issue of negligence decided by the Tribunal is not in dispute. The respondent concerned has not challenged the liability imposed on them. The only issue to be decided is, the quantum of compensation awarded.
5. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that the Tribunal has not granted any amount towards future loss of income of the deceased which is required to be granted in view of the decision in National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Pranay Sethi and Others, 2017 0 Supreme (SC) 1050. It is f
National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Pranay Sethi and Others
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Brijlata Insurance Co. Ltd.
National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Pranay Sethi
Puttamma Vs. K.L.Narayana Reddy
Raj Rani Vs. Oriental Insurance Company Limited
Smt. Hansaguti P. Ladhani v/s The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.
Sarla Dixit Versus Balwant Yadav
U.P.S.R.T.C. & Ors. v. Trilok Chandra & Ors.
Bijoy Kumar Dugar Vs. Bidyadhar Dutta
General Manager, Kerala S.R.T.C., Trivandrum v. Susamma Thomas & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.