RITU RAJ AWASTHI, DINESH KUMAR SINGH
Ramendra Soni – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Nagar Yojan & Develp. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. Angrej Nath Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party no.1 and Mr. Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite parties no.2 to 4.
2. The writ petition involves a question which is trivial in nature, as such, with the consent of parties' counsel, we proceed to decide this writ petition without calling for the counter affidavit.
3. The instant writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 29.07.2021, whereby the opposite parties have proceeded to seal the property in question i.e. Plot No.3/549, Sector H, Jankipuram, Lucknow, which was done in pursuance of the notice dated 12.07.2021.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide notice dated 12.07.2021 the petitioner was issued the show cause notice to submit his reply by 23.07.2021, however, on 19.07.2021 the sealing order was passed without waiting for the reply. It is submitted that the petitioner has been denied the opportunity to submit his reply which was called from him vide notice dated 12.07.2021.
5. Mr. Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite parties no.2 to 4 was directed t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.