ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL
Suresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Jitendra Singh, learned standing counsel for the respondents no.1 and 2.
2. Notice need not be sent to respondents no.3 and 4.
3. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:-
4. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that an application under Section 35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is pending consideration before the respondent no.2 since 2019. The limited prayer has been made for early disposal of application.
5. Learned standing counsel does not oppose the limited prayer so made by the petitioner.
6. As no useful purp
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.