SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(All) 776

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
Suresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others – Respondents
Writ C No. 9616 of 2021
Decided on : 02-07-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Rajesh Kumar

Point of Law: Mutation in cases of succession or transfer - On receipt of a report under section 33 or section 34, or upon facts otherwise coming to his knowledge, Tahsildar shall issue a proclamation and make such inquiry as appears to be necessary

Headnote:

Constitution of India 1950 –Article 226 - U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 - Section 35 –- Power of High Court to issue Writ - Writ of mandamus - Seeking direction to respondent no. 2 to decide RST Computer Case Mahesh Kumar and others Vs. Ram Kumar, Under Section 35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, Village-Chanaita, Pargana-Atrouliya, Tehsil-Budhanpur, District-Azamgarh pending before the court of Naib Tehsildar Atraulia, Tehsil-Budhanpur, District-Azamgarh, during the pendency of the present writ petition before this Hon'ble Court during the pendency of the present writ petition

Finding of the court: As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending and calling for counter affidavit, the respondent no.2, is directed to expeditiously decide Mahesh Kumar and others Vs. Ram Kumar, Under Section 35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, preferably within next four months from the date of production of a copy of this order

Result: writ petition disposed

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Jitendra Singh, learned standing counsel for the respondents no.1 and 2.

2. Notice need not be sent to respondents no.3 and 4.

3. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:-

    "A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no. 2 to decide the RST/03119 (Computer Case No. T-202015060603119) Mahesh Kumar and others Vs. Ram Kumar, Under Section 35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, Village-Chanaita, Pargana-Atrouliya, Tehsil-Budhanpur, District-Azamgarh pending before the court of Naib Tehsildar Atraulia, Tehsil-Budhanpur, District-Azamgarh, during the pendency of the present writ petition before this Hon'ble Court during the pendency of the present writ petition before this Hon'ble Court."

4. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that an application under Section 35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is pending consideration before the respondent no.2 since 2019. The limited prayer has been made for early disposal of application.

5. Learned standing counsel does not oppose the limited prayer so made by the petitioner.

6. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending and calling for counter affidavit, the respondent no.2, Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil-Budhanpur, District-Azamgarh is directed to expeditiously decide RST/03119 (Computer Case No.95 T-202015060603119) Mahesh Kumar and others Vs. Ram Kumar, Under Section 35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, Village-Chanaita, Pargana-Atrouliya, Tehsil-Budhanpur, District-Azamgarh preferably within next four months from the date of production of a copy of this order downloaded from the website of the High Court strictly in accordance with law after hearing the affected parties.

7. The writ petition stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top