SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(All) 776

ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL
Suresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Rajesh Kumar

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Jitendra Singh, learned standing counsel for the respondents no.1 and 2.

2. Notice need not be sent to respondents no.3 and 4.

3. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:-

    "A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no. 2 to decide the RST/03119 (Computer Case No. T-202015060603119) Mahesh Kumar and others Vs. Ram Kumar, Under Section 35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, Village-Chanaita, Pargana-Atrouliya, Tehsil-Budhanpur, District-Azamgarh pending before the court of Naib Tehsildar Atraulia, Tehsil-Budhanpur, District-Azamgarh, during the pendency of the present writ petition before this Hon'ble Court during the pendency of the present writ petition before this Hon'ble Court."

4. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that an application under Section 35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is pending consideration before the respondent no.2 since 2019. The limited prayer has been made for early disposal of application.

5. Learned standing counsel does not oppose the limited prayer so made by the petitioner.

6. As no useful purp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top