SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(All) 793

VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA
Prafull Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Vijay Kumar Mishra, Rajeev Singh.

JUDGMENT :

VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents.

2. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent no. 2, the Commissioner, Allahabad Division, Allahabad to decide Appeal No. 509 of 2014, (Computerized No. 2014020000509) Prafull Kumar vs. State of U.P. through the District Magistrate, Allahabad within a specific period as fixed by this Court.

3. The appeal is pending since 2014.

4. A perusal of the order-sheet right from the year 2014 reflects that except on few dates almost throughout the lawyers were abstaining from work. Once the appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution also. It is also pertinent to note that in fact, the lawyers are so regularly abstaining from work that a rubber stamp is being used on the order-sheet that the lawyers are abstaining from work. This position is continuing since the year 2014 itself till date except the period during which the Court was not functioning due to Covid-19 Pandemic.

5. Almost everyday large number of petitions are coming before this Court with similar prayers that proceedings may be decided within a time bound period a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top