IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SUNEET KUMAR, J.
Dr. Dinesh Singh Rathaur – Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P and Others – Respondents
Writ Appeal No. 6332 of 2021
Decided On : 06-10-2021
National Medical Commission Act, 2019 - Section 61(2) - Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Uttar Pradesh State Medical Colleges Teachers’ Service Rules, 1990 - Academic Qualifications - Provincial Medical Services - Requisite qualification for being appointed - Third respondent, Principal Secretary, Department of Medical Health and Family Welfare, Government of U.P. at Lucknow - determination in instant petition is as to whether seventh respondent possesses requisite qualification for being appointed Director of Mental Health Institute - It is not in dispute that Government is appointing authority of Director and Rules and Regulations framed by State Government is applicable to appointment made in Mental Health Institute, including, for post of Director - post of Director and teaching staff of Medical Health Institute - Mental Health Institute is affiliated to Dr. B.R. Ambedkar University, Agra - Government Order clearly provides that created post of Director and other teaching faculty shall be governed by Service Rules, 1990 - recruitment of a candidate to various categories of posts must possess qualifications prescribed by Medical Council of India from time to time.
Finding of the Court:
Section 61(2) of the National Medical Commission Act, 2019, clearly mandates that the educational standards, requirements and other provisions of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 and the rules and regulations made thereunder shall continue to be in force and operate till new standards or requirements are specified under 6 of 8 this Act or the rules and regulations made thereunder - Seventh respondent does not have requisite qualification for post of Director of Medical Health Institute - National Medical Commission, it is clearly stated that Rules and Regulations framed under repealing Act shall prevail as per Section 61(2) - Counter affidavit is a false and misleading statement - Deponent is liable to be prosecuted for perjury/criminal contempt - Court does not propose to proceed for criminal contempt/perjury for filing false and misleading affidavit.
Result: Petition is allowed.
JUDGMENT :
SUNEET KUMAR, J.
1. Affidavit of service has been filed. Despite notice, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the seventh respondent nor any counter affidavit has been filed.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for the State-respondents.
3. The instant petition is directed against the order dated 28 October 2020, passed by the third respondent, Principal Secretary, Department of Medical Health and Family Welfare, Government of U.P. at Lucknow, appointing the seventh respondent as Director of Institute of Mental Health and Hospital, Agar [Mental Health Institute].
4. The short question arises for determination in the instant petition is as to whether the seventh respondent possesses the requisite qualification for being appointed Director of Mental Health Institute.
5. It is not in dispute that the Government is the appointing authority of the Director and the Rules and Regulations framed by the State Government is applicable to the appointment made in the Mental Health Institute, including, for the post of Director. The State Government vide Government Order dated 29 August 2015, made applicable the provisions of the Uttar Pradesh State Medical Colleges Teachers’ Service Rules, 1990 [Service Rules, 1990] upon the post of Director and teaching staff of the Medical Health Institute. It is further noted in the Government Order that the Mental Health Institute is affiliated to Dr. B.R. Ambedkar University, Agra. The Government Order clearly provides that the created post of Director and other teaching faculty shall be governed by Service Rules, 1990. The relevant portion of the Government Order dated 29 August 2015, is extracted:
6. Rule 8 of Service Rules, 1990, as amended by Second Amendment Rules, 2005, notified on 12 August 2005, provides the academic qualifications for appointment. It is mandated that for recruitment of a candidate to various categories of posts must possess the qualifications prescribed by the Medical Council of India [MCI] from time to time. The relevant portion of the Rules is extracted:
7. It is relevant to point out that academic qualification prior to amendment of the Rules was the same. The MCI prescribed the academic qualifications in Minimum Qualifications for Teachers in Medical Institutions Regulations, 1998 (amended upto 8 June 2017). Schedule-I provides qualifications for the post of Principal/Dean/Director of Medical Institution, which reads thus:
Requirements of Academic Qualifications, Teaching and Research Experience:
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.