IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.
Bipul Raman – Petitioner
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy. Dairy Devp. Govt. Of U.P. Lko. & Ors. – Respondents
Service Bench No. 1800 of 2015 (Now S/S)
Decided On : 06-10-2021
Barabanki has suffered losses - Award - Charge-sheet - Whether inquiry officer may give his findings beyond charges so leveled against petitioner by means of charge-sheet - whether disciplinary authority may award any punishment contrary to findings of inquiry report without giving any notice to petitioner on disagreement of findings - Petitioner was serving under opposite parties no. 4 & 5. In year 2009 he was serving on post of Manager, Grade-IV Barabanki - While serving on aforesaid post petitioner has been served charge-sheet - allegations so leveled against him inquiry officer concluded his inquiry and submitted his findings before disciplinary authority.
Finding of the court : Matter may be remanded back from stage of defect of inquiry or from stage of defect of punishment order is concerned - I am of considered opinion that inquiry officer has conducted departmental inquiry as per law by affording an opportunity of hearing to petitioner as petitioner is not aggrieved from manner inquiry has been conducted – Court do not find any defect in inquiry proceedings - punishment order has been passed by disciplinary authority without issuing any show cause notice on disagreement from findings of inquiry officer – Court do not find any good ground to remand back issue to inquiry officer or disciplinary authority to pass appropriate orders, more particularly.
Result : Writ petition is allowed
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, leaned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Lalit Shukla, learned counsel for the U.P. Cooperative Dairy Federation.
2. By means of present writ petition the petitioner has assailed the order dated 26/29-9-2015 passed by the opposite party no. 4 i.e. Chairman, Administrative Committee, U.P. Cooperative Dairy Federation, Lucknow, awarding two punishments against the petitioner i.e. (i) he has been repatriated to his basic pay, and (ii) Censure entry for the year 2013-14 and his integrity for the year 2009-10 has been declared doubtful.
3. At the very outset Sri Srivastava has informed that during the pendency of the present writ petition the petitioner has attained the age of superannuation.
4. The questions to be considered are that :
(ii) As to whether the disciplinary authority may award any punishment contrary to the findings of inquiry report without giving any notice to the petitioner on the disagreement of the findings?
5. The precise facts giving rise for disposal of the aforesaid issues are that the petitioner was serving under the opposite parties no. 4 & 5. In the year 2009 he was serving on the post of Manager, Grade-IV (Finance) at Barabanki. While serving on the aforesaid post the petitioner has been served the charge-sheet dated 21.7.2014 (Annexure no. 7) wherein there were six charges against the petitioner. The petitioner participated in the departmental inquiry and disputed all the allegations so leveled against him, thereafter the inquiry officer concluded his inquiry and submitted his findings before the disciplinary authority on 30.3.2015(Annexure no. 11).
6. Admittedly, the petitioner has been exonerated from charges no. 1 to 4. However, charge nos. 5 and 6 were said to be proved partially against the petitioner.
Precisely charges no. 5 and 6 are being reproduced herein below:
nqX/k la?k ckjkcadh ds tujy Áek.kd la0 339 fnukad 31-03-2010 }kjk :0 115414-83 dh /kujkf'k ykHk gkfu lek;kstu [kkrs dks MsfcV djrs gq, vius O;fDrxr [kkrs esa bl /kujkf'k dks ØsfMV dj =qfViw.kZ ढax ls Hkqxrku ÁkIr fd;k x;k gSA ;g ik;k x;k fd mDr /kujkf'k dkuiqj nqX/k la?k dh ftl ,Mokbt la0 27@01 fnukad 31-03-2010 dk mYYks[k djrs gq, mijksDr ys[kk Áfof"V dh x;h gS] mldk ys[kkadu dkuiqj nqX/k la?k ls ÁkIr nqX/k la?k ckjkcadh ds foRRkh; o"kZ 2009&10 o 2010&11 ds ystj ,dkmUV esa ugha gSA
mDr ls Li"V gS fd vki }kjk QthZ ,Mokbt ds vk/kkj ij mijksDr ys[kk Áfof"V dj nqX/k la?k ckjkcadh ls :0 115414-83 dh /kujkf'k dk vkgj.k fd;k x;k gS] ftlds fy;s vki nks"kh gS ,oa vkidh lR;fu"Bk Hkh lafnX/k gSA
lk{;&
1- ckjkcadh nqX/k la?k ds foRRkh; o"kZ 2009&10 ds ykHk gkfu lek;kstu [kkrs dh Nk;k ÁfrA
2- dkuiqj nqX/k la?k ls ÁkIr foRRkh; o"kZ 2009&10 o 2010&11 ds ystj ,dkmUV dh Nk;kÁfrA
vkjksi la[;k 6
nqX/k la?k ckjkcadh dks fnukad 1-4-08 ls fnukad 31-3-13 rd :0 1]05]74]656-25 dh gkfu;kW gqbZA ekg vÁSy 13 ls fnlEcj 13 rd nqX/k la?k }kjk Ásf"kr VsªfMax vkijsfVax fooj.k ds vqulkj :0 53]20]115]00 dh udn gkfu;kW gks pqdh gSA foRRkh; Ok"kZ 2012&13 ds lfefr deh'ku dh /kujkf'k :0 33]53]495-00 tujy okmpj la0 218 fnukad 31-03-2014 ,oa foRRkh; o"kZ 2013&14¼1-4-2013 ls 31-12-2013½ ds lfefr deh'ku dh /kujkf'k :0 1945449-00 tujy okmpj la0 219 fnukad 31-03-2014 }kjk MsfcV dh x;h gSA blds vfrfjDr foRRkh; o"kZ 13&14 esa ykHk gkfu lek;kstu [kkrs esa :0 38]22]496-51 dh /kujkf'k fnukad 26-1-14 rd MsfcV dh x;h gSA bl Ádkj nqX/k la?k ckjkcadh dks 1-4-08 ls fnlECkj] 13 rd :0 2]50]16]211-76 dh gkfu gqbZ gS ftlds fy;s vki mRRkjnk;h gSA
lk{;&
1- nqX/k la?k ckjkcadh dh ekg vÁSYk 13 ls fnlEcj] 13 rd nqX/k la?k }kjk Ásf"kr VsªfMax vkijsfVax fooj.k dh Nk;kÁfrA
2- nqX/k la?k ckjkcadh ds tujy okmpj la0 218 o 219 fnukad 31-03-2014 dh N;k ÁfrA
3- nqX/k la?k ckjkcadh ds ykHk gkfu [kkrs ds lek;kstu dh Nk;k ÁfrA
4- nqX/k la?k ckjkcadh dh foRRkh; o"kZ 2008&09 l
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.