SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(All) 871

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
ANJANI KUMAR MISHRA, SYED AFTAB HUSAIN RIZVI, JJ.
Nizam - Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.2667 of 1988
Decided on : 07-10-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Lal Ji Chaudhary Ac, Lal Ji Chaudhary Ac

Point of law : Conviction upheld - Ocular testimony stands corroborated with medical evidence - Recovery of weapon at the instance of accused.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code,1860 - Sections 302/34 - Criminal Procedure Code,1973 - Section 313 - Evidence Act - Section 32 - Offence of murder - Circumstantial Evidence - Appeal against conviction - Murder by stabbing with knife - Before his death deceased has said that Accused has inflicted knife blows on him - Death was due to shock and haemorrhage as a result of ante mortem injuries and duration of death was about one day - Identification of accused - Testimony of witness - In the FIR it has been alleged that Nizam was seen in the light of torch while fleeing. It also appears from the perusal of original Tahreer that this particular line is an addition after completion of the whole contents which makes it doubtful. So torch as source of light is not reliable.

Finding of the Court :

Even if it is presumed that there was no electricity supply at the time of occurrence, it is clear from the evidence that accused and witnesses were well known to one another. It is not necessary that a person could be identified only by his face. A person can be identified through his appearance, gestures and voice also - It is not a case of one or two stabbing and incident has not occurred in a moment - Deceased by repeatedly stabbed - There is no doubt about the identification of the accused and hence, source of light does not matter - Oral testimony of a witness can not be outrightly rejected merely on the ground that he is an interested or related witness. What is required is a cautious scrutiny.

Result : Appeal dismissed

JUDGMENT :

Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi, J.

1. Heard Sri Lal Ji Chaudhary, learned Amicus Curiae for the appellant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

2. This criminal appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 16.11.1988 passed by Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Aligarh in Session Trial No. 70 of 1987 and connected Session Trial No. 659 of 1987 convicting and sentencing the appellant to undergo life imprisonment under section 302 IPC.

3. In brief the prosecution case is that complainant Sultan gave an application dated 16.5.1986 at P.S. Harduwaganj alleging therein that on 15.5.1986 at 8:35 P.M. his younger brother Saddiq has gone to fetch bidi from the shop situated beneath the mosque. When he was coming back and reached near the house of Mazhar Husain, then Nizam resident of Jalali, P.S. Harduwaganj who is a bad character and criminal and Saddiq used to desist him from such acts, stabbed Saddiq with knife. On cries of Saddiq complainant, Shakir, Shabbir and other persons came there and Nizam ran away. When Saddiq was taken to hospital he died there.

    Before his death Saddiq has said that Nizam has inflicted knife blows on him.

On the aforesaid information Case Crime No. 96 of 1986, under section 302 IPC was registered against accused Nizam. Investigation of the case was conducted by S.I. Dal Chand. The inquest proceeding of the dead body was conducted and related papers were also prepared and body was sealed and sent for postmortem examination. The Investigating Officer recorded the statements of complainant and other witnesses, visited the place of occurrence and prepared the site plan. Accused Nizam was arrested by the police station Quarsi, District Aligarh and on his interrogation by the Investigating Officer he disclosed that the knife used in the incident has been concealed by him and at his instance on 19.5.1986 at 8:00 P.M. one knife with blood stains was recovered from the ‘Chhappar’ in the house of Nanna, the maternal uncle of accused Nizam. Memo was prepared and knife was sealed and sent for forensic examination. Nanna was also implicated as an accused and after completion of investigation separate charge-sheet under section 302 IPC was filed against Nizam and Nanna.

Two session trial nos. 70 of 1987 and 659 of 1987 committed to the court of session were consolidated.

The trial court framed charge under section 302 IPC against accused Nizam and under section 302/34 IPC against accused Nanna.

The prosecution produced 7 witnesses who have proved 9 prosecution papers Ex. Ka-1 to Ex. Ka-9 and one material Exhibit (Knife). Statements of accused under section 313 Cr.P.C. were recorded in which they denied the prosecution case and statements of witnesses. Accused Nizam has also said that witnesses are deposing against him due to enmity. One defence witness Aharpal Singh, Junior Engineer has been produced as D.W. 1. The learned trial court by the impugned judgment has convicted accused Nizam under section 302 IPC and sentenced him to life imprisonment while acquitted accused Nanna from the charge under section 302/34 IPC.

4. The conviction of accused Nizam is under consideration in this appeal.

5. Postmortem of deceased Saddiq has been conducted on 16.5.1986 at 5:00 P.M. by Dr. I.H. Qureshi who has appeared as P.W. 5 and has proved the postmortem report as Ex. Ka-12.

    According to postmortem report the age of the deceased was about 45 years. In external examination Average built body, rigor mortis was present in both upper and lower extremities, eyes closed, mouth half open, abdomen slightly distended, no signs of decomposition. Following ante mortem injuries were present on the body of the deceased:

1. Incised wound 1½ cm. X ½ cm x muscle deep on the right side chest, 1 cm. above right nipple.

2. Incised wound 5 cm. X 1½ cm. X chest cavity on the right side lower chest, 11 cm. below right nipple.

3. Incised wound 4 cm. X 1½ cm. X abdomen cavity on the left side upper abdomen, 12 cm. above umbilicus.

4. Incise

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top