VIKAS BUDHWAR
Rajani – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This is a revision purported to be under Section 397/401 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 assailing the validity and the correctness of the order dated 4.8.2021 passed by Special Judge SC/ST Act, Bareilly in Criminal Case No.1117 of 2021, under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., Police Station Fatehganj West, District Bareilly (Smt. Rajni Vs. Jameel Ahamad and others).
2. Sri Dinesh Singh, AOR No.A-1-18-0439/2012 had made a statement that he is holding brief of Sri Bhaskar Bhadndra, AOR No.A/B-0142/2012, who has filed the present revision and he has been authorised by Sri Bhaskar Bhadndra, AOR No.A/B-0142/2012 to argue the present revision.
3. Heard Sri Dinesh Singh, AOR No.A-1-18-0439/2012 holding brief of Sri Bhaskar Bhadndra, AOR No.A/B-0142/2012, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Pankaj Saksena, learned AGA for opposite party no.1.
4. In view of the order so passed in the present revision, there is no need to issue notices to opposite parties no.2 and 3.
5. Brief facts of the case as recapitulated in the present revision are as under:-
6. As per the pleading set forth in the application purported to be under Section 156 Cr.P.C. 1973 before the Court of Special Judge,
Johar and Ors. vs. Mangal Prasad and Ors.
Kishan Rao vs. Shankargouda (2018) 8 SCC 165
Lalita kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others
Logendra Nath Jha and Ors. v. Polailal Biswas
Priyanka Srivastava and Ors. vs. State of U.P. and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.