VIKAS BUDHWAR
Ashok Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Dharmendra Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist and learned AGA, who appears for the opposite party no.1.
2. The revisionist has filed the present revision challenging the order dated 4.9.2021 passed by Additional Judicial Magistrate, Moradabad in Misc. Case No.1129 of 2021 Ashok Kumar Vs. Smt. Mohini Mishra, whereby whereunder the court below has rejected the application preferred by the revisionist under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. for lodging the first information report against opposite parties no. 2 to 9.
3. As per case set up by the revisionist, revisionist is a social worker, who is effectively involved in social work and he continuously prefers application under Right To Information Act, 2005 on account whereof the opposite party no.2 bore personal enmity with him.
4. The revisionist has further come up with the case that the villagers approach him regarding solving their of difficulties and problems. Revisionist was also in aspirant for contesting the elections of the office of Pradhan. However, the same was earmarked as a woman seat, the revisionist made her mother the contestant on account whereof the opposite party no.2 became annoyed as according t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.