JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Ajay Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the revisionist as well as Sri L.D. Rajbhar, who appears for the opposite party no.1.

2. This is a revision under Section 397/401 of the Cr.P.C. challenging the order dated 13.10.2021 passed by Special Judge (P.C.Act) Court No.2/Additional Sessions Judge, Bareilly in Special Case No. 3 of 2018 arising out of Case Crime No.154 of 2016 under Section 8/9 Prevention of Corruption Act (State Vs Chand Patrakar and another), P.S. Hasanpur, District Amroha by which the court below has rejected the application preferred by the revisionist under Section 311 of the Cr.P.C.

3. Briefly stated facts are that an FIR was lodged by the opposite party no.2 against the revisionists, who are two in numbers, on 10.4.2016 before the P.S. Hasanpur, District Amroha being Case Crime No.154 of 2016 with an allegation that against the opposite party no.2 and their relatives, a case relating to dowry was lodged and which was under investigation by C.O. Hasanpur and about 7 to 8 days prior to the lodging of the present FIR one Latif (Milkman) had recommended the name of the revisionist and a meeting also arranged with them wherein the issue with regar