K.J.THAKER, VIKAS BUDHWAR
State of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Kashmir Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned Government Pleader for the appellant.
2. This appeal under Section 378(3) of CrPC challenges the acquittal of the accused, who was charged with commission of offence under Sections 363 and 366 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
3. The prosecution was moved into motion by a written report dated 18.6.1996 at P.S. Dannahar, District Mainpuri and it was alleged that the sister of the complainant, who was 14 years of age, when they went to ease in the field, accused Kashmir Singh, Pappu and Girish Chandra enticed away the prosecutrix, namely, the sister of the complainant. The complainant's mother started searching the prosecutrix, but the prosecutrix end the accused absconded and the complainant did not lodge the complaint because of the fear of being defamed. It was then disclosed that the accused had kidnapped the minor and therefore, the case being Crime no. 117 of 1996 under Sections 363, 366 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) was lodged. The police investigated the matter and the victim/ prosecutrix was recovered on 27.9.1996 from a village known as Bhanupura
The State of Gujarat vs. B.L. Dave
M.S. Narayana Menon @ Mani vs. State of Kerala and another
Chandrappa vs. State of Karnataka
Luna Ram vs. Bhupat Singh and others
Mookkiah and another v. State Representatives by the Inspector of Police, Tamil Nadu
State of Rajasthan vs. Sohan Lal and Others
State of Karnataka vs. Hemareddy
State of Punjab vs. Madan Mohan Lal Verma
Jayaswamy vs. State of Karnataka
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.