SIDDHARTH
Rahul – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
ORDER :
Siddharth, J.
1. Heard Sri Nirvikar Gupta and Sri Ishwar Chandra Tyagi, learned counsels for the appellants, Sri Dharam Veer Singh and Sri P.K. Singh, learned counsels for the informant, Sri Vikas Goswami and Smt. Alpana Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The above noted criminal appeals have been preferred against the judgment and order of conviction dated 10.8.2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge/FTC, Court No. 2, Hathras in S.T. No. 105 of 2013 (State Vs. Rahul and others), arising out of case crime No. 404 of 2011 under sections 304-B, 498-A, 316 I.P.C. and section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Kotwali Hathras, District Hathras convicting and sentencing the appellants for commission of offence under section 304-B I.P.C., to ten years rigorous imprisonment; for offence under section 316 I.P.C. to seven years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 20,000/-, in case of default in payment of fine one year additional rigorous imprisonment; under section 498-A I.P.C. to three years imprisonment and fine of Rs. 5,000/-, in case of default in payment of fine to undergo additional imprisonment of six months and under section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act to two years i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.