SHAMIM AHMED
Khalid – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Thru Prin Secy Deptt Of Home Civil Secy. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Shamim Ahmed, J.
Heard Shri Lal Bahadur Khan, the learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Ravish Kumar Mishra, the learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The applicant, Khalid, has moved the present bail application seeking bail in F.I.R. No. 157 of 2021, under Sections 354, 506, 376 I.P.C., Police Station Hanswar, District Ambedkar Nagar.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been roped in, in a false and fabricated case by the complainant. The complainant alleges in the F.I.R. that she is the sister-in-law (Bhabhi) of the applicant. She got married with Mohammad Hashim, elder brother of the applicant, who died two years back, she is having two sons. Her brother-in-law, Khalid, used to visit her parental house, and on finding her alone he used to commit obscene act with her. When she complained about the same to her father-in-law and other brothers-in-law, then they threatened her for dire consequences.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case by the victim/ complainant. He is the brother-in-law (Devar) of the complainant. Initially the F.I.R. was lodged under S
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.