SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 40

OM PRAKASH TRIPATHI
Pratima Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For The Appellant : Rajiv Lochan Shukla,Anand Pati Tiwari,Chandra Shekhar Rai
For The Respondent: G.A.,Suresh Chandra Pandey

JUDGMENT :

Om Prakash Tripathi, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and learned AGA for the State.

2. Criminal Revision No. 2921 of 2018 has been preferred against the order dated 18.04.2016 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Mirzapur in Miscellaneous Case No. 220 of 2014 (Pratima Singh Vs. Pankaj Singh @ Dablu Singh), under Section 125 Cr.P.C, Police Station Kachhawan, District Mirzapur, whereby the learned court has rejected the prayer of revisionist for grant of maintenance of Rs.8000/-per month from opposite party no. 2 and has granted monthly maintenance of Rs.2000/-per month from the date of order.

3. Criminal Revision No. 2922 of 2018 has been preferred against the order dated 18.04.2016 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Mirzapur in Miscellaneous Case No. 220 of 2014 (Pratima Singh Vs. Pankaj Singh @ Dablu Singh), under Section 125 Cr.P.C, Police Station Kachhawan, District Mirzapur, whereby, the learned trial court has allowed the maintenance of Rs.2000/-per month to the opposite party no. 2 from the date of order.

4. As both the revisions have been preferred against the order dated 18.04.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top