SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 126

RAJ BEER SINGH
Pradeep Kumar Patel – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Chandra Bhan Kushwaha

JUDGMENT :

RAJ BEER SINGH, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.

2. It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. As per prosecution version, applicant and co-accused Ajit Vishwakarma and Prakash have got withdrawn Rs.10,000/-by the deceased from his account and thereafter, they have consumed liquor and when deceased lost his consciousness, applicant and co-accused persons committed theft of the remaining amount of deceased and later on, deceased has died due to excessive intake of liquor. Learned counsel submitted that allegations made against applicant are thoroughly false and that in post-mortem report of deceased, no injury has been shown on the body of deceased and cause of death could not be ascertained and thus, viscera was preserved but viscera report is yet to be received. It was further submitted that applicant has no motive at all to cause death of deceased or to cause any harm to him and in fact deceased himself has consumed liquor and he died due to excessive intake of liquor. It has been further submitted that similarly placed c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top