VIKAS KUNVAR SRIVASTAV
Satendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The case is called out through video conferencing.
2. Learned counsel for the bail-applicant, Sri Rama Pati Shukla, Advocate and learned A.G.A. for the State, Sri Anurag Singh Chauhan, Advocate are connected through video conferencing in virtual hearing of the case.
3. The present bail-application is moved on behalf of accused-applicant-Satendra Kumar, involved in Case Crime No.356 of 2019, under Sections 498-A, 304B of I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, registered at Police Station Mishrikh, District Sitapur.
4. The occasion of present bail-application has arisen on rejection of bail-plea of the accused-applicant by learned Sessions Judge, District Sitapur vide order dated 04.12.2019.
5. Counter affidavit and rejoinder affidavit have already been exchanged between the contesting parties to the case, as such, the case is ripe for hearing.
6. Reading over the first information report, learned counsel for the bail-applicant submits, the prosecution case as emerging from the first information report is, the informant’s sister was recurrently being subjected to cruelty in connection with demand of the dowry just after few days from marriage by her in-laws namely h
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.