IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, JAYANT BANERJI, JJ.
Buddha Sortex Rice Industries Private Limited – Petitioner
Versus
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax and Others – Respondents
Writ Tax No. 449 of 2022
Decided On : 29-03-2022
Finance Act, 2021 - Sections 148 and 149 - Nature of certiorari quashing notice - Only argument advanced by counsel for petitioner before us is that normal period of limitation for issuing notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 would be six years where escapement of income from tax is one lacs or more - In this regard he referred to provision of Section 149(1) (b) of Act - He further submits that since prior approval of the Principal Commissioner in terms of provisions of Section 151 of Act of 1961 has not been obtained for issuance of notice under Section 148(1) of Act of 1961, therefore issuance of notice after expiry of four years but before expiry of six years notice is bad and without jurisdiction - provisions of Section 149(1) of the Act of 1961 are plain and unambiguous. Bare reading of clause (a) of sub-section (1) of Section 149 leaves no manner of doubt that normal period of limitation for issuance of notice under Section 148 of the Act of 1961 is four years from the end of the relevant assessment year, unless the case falls under clause (b) or clause (c) – Para 8.
Finding of the Court:
Normal period of limitation of four years was available to Assessing Authority till which was extended for one year by aforesaid Ordinance, 2020 and notification issued there - Normal period of limitation available to Assessing Authority on present case was till - Impugned notice under Section 148 of the Act, 1961 was issued by Assessing Authority on which does not require any prior approval of Principal Commissioner in terms of then existing provisions of Section 151 of Act, 1961 - Therefore impugned notice under Section 148 of Act of 1961 issued by Assessing Authority is wholly valid and same has been issued well within period of limitation.
Result: Writ Petition Dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri. Parv Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. Gaurav Mahajan, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department.
2. This writ petition has been filed praying for the following reliefs:
(b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus restraining the respondents from proceeding with the reassessment proceedings against the petitioner for the AY-2015-16.”
3. The only argument advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner before us is that the normal period of limitation for issuing notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1961) would be six years where escapement of income from tax is one lacs or more. In this regard, he referred to the provision of Section 149(1) (b) of the Act of 1961. He further submits that since prior approval of the Principal Commissioner in terms of provisions of Section 151 of the Act of 1961 has not been obtained for issuance of notice under Section 148(1) of the Act of 1961, therefore, issuance of notice after expiry of four years but before expiry of six years, the notice is bad and without jurisdiction. No other arguments have been made before us by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. Sri. Gaurav Mahajan, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the Income Tax Department submits that the normal period of limitation for re-opening as provided under Section 149(1) (a) of the Act of 1961 is four years in all cases but where four years have expired but not six years and escaped assessment amounts to or likely to amount to Rs. one lac or more for that year, then still notice may be issued but after obtaining approval of the Principal Commissioner as per the provisions of Section 151 of the Act of 1961.
5. Since, in the present set of fact, the normal period of limitation for re-opening for the assessment year 2015-2016 was available till 31.3.2020 which was extended by the Taxation and other Law (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020 and the notification issued thereunder, taking into the situation created due to pandemic Covid-19, the normal period of limitation was available till 31.3.2021. The impugned notice has been issued prior to the expiry of normal period of limitation, therefore, the impugned notice does not suffer from any infirmity and is valid.
6. We have carefully considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties.
7. Section 149 of the Act of 1961 provides for limitation for issuance of notice under Section 148. Section 149 as is extended prior to amendment of Finance Act, 2021 is reproduced below:
(1) No notice under section 148 shall be issued for the relevant assessment year:
(a) if four years have elapsed from the end of the relevant assessment year, unless the case falls under clause (b) or clause (c).
(b) if four years, but not more than six years, have elapsed from the end of the relevant assessment year unless the income chargeable to tax which has escaped assessment amounts to or is likely to amount to one lakh rupees or more for that year.
(c) if four years, but not more than sixteen years, have elapsed from the end of the relevant assessment year unless the income in relation to any asset (including financial interest in any entity) located outside India, chargeable to tax, has escaped assessment.”
8. The provisions of Section 149(1) of the Act of 1961 are plain and unambiguous. Bare reading of clause (a) of sub-section (1) of Section 149 leaves no manner of doubt that normal period of limitation for issuance of notice under
provisions of Section 149(1) of the Act of 1961 are plain and unambiguous. Bare reading of clause (a) of sub-section (1) of Section 149 leaves no manner of doubt that normal period of limitation for ....
The issuance of notice under Section 148A(b) was barred by limitation, violating the requirement for a reasonable opportunity to respond.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the time limits for issuing notices for reopening assessments under the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the impact of the changes b....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.