NAHEED ARA MOONIS
Kishore Lal Chugh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant Sri Amit Daga and the learned counsel Sri Vikrant Rana appearing on behalf of the respondent no.2 and the learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The instant petition has been filed with the prayer to quash the entire proceedings of criminal complaint Case No. 173/9 of 2007, under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, police station Kotwali, district Muzaffar Nagar whereby the applicant has been summoned to face trial vide order dated 2.6.2007 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffar Nagar.
3. The prosecution case in a short conspectus is that the opposite party no. 2 has filed a complaint against the applicant on 26.4.2007, under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The respondent no. 2 came in contact with the applicant and entered into partnership on 11.2.2000 in Muzaffar Nagar and executed a joint venture agreement on 17.4.2000. The partnership business was in the name and style of "Priyanka Aryan Constructions". In 2002 due to ill intention the applicant started cheating to defraud the opposite party no. 2 and hence the complainant filed a case No. 6 of 2003 before the court
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.