SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(All) 1409

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Anjani Kumar Mishra, Shekhar Kumar Yadav, JJ.
Babulley - Appellant
Vs.
State of U.P. - Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 8532 of 2008
Decided On : 09-02-2021

Advocates Appeared:
For The Appellant : D.N. Yadav, Bharat Singh Pankaj, M.K. Yadav, Noor Mohammad, S.V.Singh
For The Respondent:Govt. Advocate

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code,1860 - Sections 302,300 and 304 - Criminal Procedure Code,1973 - Section 313 and 161 - Offence of murder – Examination of accused - Lodged by her husband-Vijay Shanker was proceeding from their house towards their field When they reached in front of house of one appellant emerged from his house which was situated at some distance resulting in his death on spot - It is also stated in first information report that on the previous night had gone to village to consume liquor and there, they had an argument. It is on the account of the said argument assaulted– Held, Case was not of a sudden quarrel - Cause of incident according to the prosecution was a fight or argument which took place between the deceased and appellant on previous night - Single blow therefore cannot be said to be one which was delivered during a sudden quarrel and in heat of moment - conviction was still affirmed by the Apex Court as the injury caused to the deceased were consistent with weapon recovered despite the seizure witnesses having turn hostile - Injury suffered by deceased are consistent with the recovered weapon - Appellant is therefore not entitled to any benefit under judgment cited - Court are conscious of the fact that mere delay in recording of statement of the eye witnesses by Investigating Officer cannot de-facto raise suspicions in the mind of the Court about the veracity of prosecution case, more particularly, about the veracity of the eye witnesses - Appeal is dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Shri Noor Mohammad, learned counsel for the appellant and Shri L.D. Razbhar & Prem Shanker Mishra, learned A.G.A.s for the State.

2. The instant appeal is directed against the judgement and order convicting the appeal and sentencing him to life imprisonment, which judgement has been passed on 02.12.18 by the Additional Session Judge, Fast Track Court No.2, Bhadohi at Gyanpur in Session Trial No.103 of 2003 (State Vs. Babulley) under Section 302 I.P.C., Police Station-Bhadohi, District-Sant Ravidas Nagar, Bhadohi, convicting and sentencing the appellant to life imprisonment. A Fine of Rs.10,000/-have also been imposed and in default thereof, two years further imprisonment has been ordered.

3. Sessions Trial No.103 of 2003 pertains to an incident which took place on 27.07.2003 at about 9:00 a.m. in village Jagdishpur. The first information report in this regard was lodged at 11:00 a.m. on the same date at Police Station-Bhadohi Kotwali, District-Sant Ravidas Nagar.

4. As per the first information report lodged by Laldei Devi w/o Vijay Shanker, she alongwith her husband-Vijay Shanker was proceeding from their house towards their field at about 9:00 a.m.. When they reached in front of the house of one Chauthi, Babulley-appellant emerged from his house which was situated at some distance and hit Vijay Shanker on his head with a rambha, resulting in his death on the spot.

5. It is also stated in the first information report that on the previous night, Vijay Shanker and Babulley had gone to village Katauna to consume liquor and there, they had an argument. It is on the account of the said argument that Babulley assaulted Vijay Shanker. The incident is alleged to have been witnessed by Paras Nath s/o Munni Lal, Ram Pyare s/o Sakal Dhadi and some other persons.

6. After investigation, a charge sheet was submitted and the matter was committed and tried.

7. As many as 10 witnesses were examined on behalf of the prosecution. They are P.W.-1 (Laldei Devi w/o deceased), P.W.-2 (Ram Pyare) one of the eye witness mentioned in the first information report, P.W.-3 (Nand Lal) the alleged witness of the recovery of the iron rod i.e., rambha (the weapon used in the crime), P.W.-4 (Vijay Nath) the scribe of the first information report, P.W.-5 (Dr. Sunil Kumar Srivastava), who conducted the post mortem report of the deceased, P.Ws.-6 to 10 are the police personnel including the Investigating Officer, the Sub-Inspector, who carried out the inquest.

8. Ram Saran s/o Mathura, is the sole witness examined in defence, apart from the statement of the accused recorded under Section 313 Cr.P.C.

9. P.W.-1, the first informant has in his oral testimony supported the version given in the first information report. She has also stated that she is illiterate and that the first information report was scribed by Vijay Nath on her dictation and thereafter, she put her thumb impression, thereon. She has also stated that the first information report wrongly records that the incident took place in front of the house of appellant-Babulley. In fact, it took place in front of the house of Chauthi and that the discrepancy in the F.I.R. is on account of her mental agitation due to death of her husband. She has also stated that her husband was fond of consuming liquor. It is also stated in her statement in cross-examination that she and her husband were proceeding from their house with rice sapplings, on foot. She has also denied the suggestion that the deceased was assaulted by other persons.

10. P.W.-2 Ram Pyare has stated that he was returning from his field. When he reached near the house of Chauthi, Babulley emerged from his house armed with a iron (rambha) and assaulted the deceased on his head with the rear portion or its handle. Vijay Shanker fell on spot and expired. Babulley ran away with the rambha. He has denied the suggestion that there was tension between him and Babulley. He has also been elaborately cross-examined as regards the houses situated in

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top