JUDGMENT :

Deepak Verma, J.

1. Heard Sri Dheeraj Singh (Bohra), learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Anil Srivastava, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Harikesh Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2, learned AGA on behalf of the State and perused the record.

2. Pleadings are exchanged between the parties.

3. Present criminal revision has been preferred against the judgement and order dated 12.02.2020 passed by Additional District Judge, Court No.3, Gautam Budh Nagar, in Sessions Trial No.454 of 2018 (State vs. Sundar Bhati & another) under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302/34, 120-B I.P.C. & Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station Bisrakh, District Gautam Budh Nagar, whereby discharge application (5C) of the revisionist filed under Section 227 Cr.P.C. has been rejected.

4. The revisionist has challenged the revision on the following grounds:-

I. Because, the judgment and order dated 12.02.2020 passed by Court below is illegal, irregular, improper and incorrect as such the same is liable to be set aside by this Hon’ble Court.

II. Because, the learned Additional District Judge/Court No.3, Gautam Budh Nagar, has not assigned detailed reasons for dismiss