SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(All) 1417

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Rahul Chaturvedi, J.
Ram Awatar And Another - Applicant
Vs.
State of U.P. - Opposite Party
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 5704 of 2021
Decided On : 19-2-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Kameshwar Singh
For the Respondent: G.A.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code,1860 - Sections 498A, 304B - D.P. Act - Section ¾ - Demand of additional dowry – Dowry Death – Bail application - Informant's daughter Bandana got married with Rajju@Pawan - After three months of her marriage when she came from her 'sasural' to her parent's place, then she shared the atrocious behaviour qua her, by none other than her own husband and other inlaws in connection with motorcycle, golden chain and additional dowry - Almost on regular basis, threats were extended to her with regard to aforesaid demand of additional dowry but keeping in view future of her daughter, informant did not take any legal recourse or prosecuted them for alleged dowry related atrocities - On eve of “Rakshabandhan” when deceased came to her parent's place, again, she reiterated same sad saga regarding stepmotherely treatment to her for want of additional dowry - She has scarcely informed that there is persistent demand for above articles and cash amount else anything untoward may happen to her - Held, Court cannot accept this alleged “sudden wisdom” dawn upon them to get the nature of the offence changed. Such type of affidavits are rampant nowadays for simple reason. This alleged truce between the rival parties outside the Court is nothing but for monetary considerations arrived between them - Court directs to court concerned having competent jurisdiction to hold indepth probe into matter engaging some senior police officer at least of a C.O. rank to verify and explore, whether prosecution story narrated by informant in FIR, is true and correct OR averements made and signed by aforesaid persons in their respective affidavits are correct - If legislation in its wisdom has enacted stringent action under Section 304B IPC to deal with such heinous offences and has prescribed serious punishment against wrongdoers - Bail application allowed.

JUDGMENT :

Rahul Chaturvedi, J.

1. Heard Sri Kameshwar Singh, learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

2. The applicants who are aged old parentsinlaw are facing prosecution in case crime no.162 of 2020, under sections 498A, 304B IPC and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station Atarra, District Banda and behind the bars since 01.09.2020.

3. Submission made by learned counsel for the applicants, is that the applicants reside at Mohallah Ambedekar Nagar, Ward No.6, Nagar Panchayat Oran, Bisanda, District Banda but the informant has purposely shown their address in the FIR as Mohallah Krishna Nagar, Gutthilla Purwa, Police Station Attara, District Banda. This by itself shows that the applicant has got two distinct places of residences, one at Police Station Bisanda and another is at Attara.

4. It is contended that the FIR was got registered by Ram Pratap Kori on 30.08.2020 at 20:26 hours for the alleged unfortunate incident said to have taken place at 5:00 am on the same day. The next submission is that informant's daughter Bandana got married with Rajju@Pawan on 29.05.2019. After three months of her marriage when she came from her 'sasural' to her parent's place, then she shared the atrocious behaviour qua her, by none other than her own husband and other inlaws in connection with motorcycle, golden chain and Rs.50,000/as an additional dowry. It is further submitted that almost on the regular basis, threats were extended to her with regard to the aforesaid demand of additional dowry but keeping in view the future of her daughter, the informant did not take any legal recourse or prosecuted them for alleged dowry related atrocities. On the eve of “Rakshabandhan” when the deceased came to her parent's place, again, she reiterated the same sad saga regarding stepmotherely treatment to her for want of additional dowry. She has scarcely informed that there is persistent demand for above articles and cash amount else anything untoward may happen to her.

On 28.08.2020, around six in the morning, the soninlaw of the informant, informed him about the untimely and mysterious demise of Bandana(hence deceased). Soon thereafter, the informant and other relatives reached to the spot, and saw that after assaulting her daughter, all the named accused persons killed her and her dead body was lying on the bed with number of bruises over her person. From the FIR , it is explicitly clear that the SCRIBE of the FIR was none other than the first informant Ram Pratap Kori himself, showing his address as Mohallah Ambedekar Nagar, Ward No.6, Nagar Panchayat Oran, Bisanda, District Banda. Thus, on the hand written chik report by the informant Ram Pratak Kori over which he has put his own signatures, the FIR was got registered within reasonable time of the incident.

On the aforesaid prosecution story, it was pointed out by learned counsel for the applicants, that it is the applicant no.1 who has informed the police on the same day by G.D. Entry no.020 dated 28.08.2020 at 12:48 hours, informing that her daughterinlaw has committed suicide by hanging herself. Thus, it was argued by learned counsel for the applicant that no effort was made on the part of the applicant either to fled away from the site or to do any other action to hide or dilute the gravity of the offence. On the contrary, applicant no.1 himself informed the police about this unfortunate incident that his daughterinlaw has committed suicide. Thereafter, the formalities of the inquest was performed on the same day in which the informant and his brother put his signatures as one of “Panch”. On this, it is further argued that, there is no whisper of any dowry related harassment or demand by the named accused persons from informant or his brother who were present during the inquest proceedings. It was unanimously decided by all the 'PANCHS', that probably she has committed suicide by hanging herself but in order to ascertain exact cause of her death, her autopsy was r

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top