JUDGMENT :

Jaspreet Singh, J.

1. Heard Shri D.C. Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Vasu Deo Mishra, learned counsel for the private-respondents no.4 and 5 as well as learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

2. By means of the this writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the order dated 16.07.1982 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Sultanpur in Revisions No.199 and 341, whereby the revision preferred by the petitioner was dismissed while the other revision preferred by the Baij Nath was allowed.

3. The original-petitioner Garibey died during pendency of the petition and he is represented by his legal heirs. The private-respondent no.4 Baij Nath also died and is represented by his legal heirs. For the sake of convenience, this Court shall refer to the parties as they appeared in the original memo of the writ petition.

4. The dispute relates to the plots of basic year Khata No.94 recorded jointly in the names of the petitioner and the respondents no.4 and 5. The petitioner Garibey filed his objections under Section 9-A of the U.P. Consolidation and Holdings Act, 1953 wherein he had raised his objections in respect of Khata No.94,