SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(All) 1402

SUNEET KUMAR
Subhash Chandra Maurya – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Suresh Chandra Shukla, Radha Kant Ojha
For the Respondent: C.S.C.,Shashi Kant Verma

JUDGMENT :

Kumar, J.

1. Heard learned counsels appearing for the petitioners in the batch of connected writ petitions, learned counsels appearing for the respondents and learned standing counsel for the State-respondents and perused the material placed on record.

2. Learned counsels appearing for the petitioners in the instant writ petition and the other batch of writ petitions submit that the facts, inter se, parties are similar and can be decided by a common judgment.

3. For the sake of convenience, the facts stated in the Writ Petition No. 8117 of 2021 is being referred to for deciding the writ petitions.

4. Petitioner was admitted to Basic Training Course under Physically Handicapped Quota (in short 'P.H.') on the strength of P.H. certificate dated 12.09.2006, issued by the office of the Chief Medical Officer, Sonbhadra, wherein, it is noted that petitioner is having 60% hearing problem (deafness). The petitioner came to be appointed as Assistant Teacher in Primary School, run and managed by second respondent-Basic Shiksha Parishad, Uttar Pradesh on 30.06.2011, under the other backward class category (OBC). Thereafter, on assessing the work, performance and conduct of the petitioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top